Options
Multicenter evaluation of propofol for head-injured patients in Taiwan
Type
article
Resource
Surgical Neurology.(66):S2-37-S2-42.
Date Issued
2006
Author(s)
Chiu WT; Lin TJ; Lin JW; Huang SJ; Chang CK; Chen HY
Subjects
藥學系
期刊論文
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study was a multicenter, retrospective study which aimed to evaluate the efficacy of propofol, a new choice of pharmacotherapy in head-injured patients.
METHODS: Head-injured patients admitted to 3 hospitals during the period from January 2003 to December 2004 were included in this clinical trial. Data on patients' demographics, laboratory data, GCS score, ICP, CPP, concurrent medications, and therapeutic outcomes were collected.
RESULTS: Among the 104 patients included, only 44 were given propofol. The average age was 40.8 +/- 22 years for all patients, with 41.91 +/- 20.41 and 43.48 +/- 23.19 years for the propofol group and nonpropofol group, respectively (P=.097). There was no significant difference in baseline GCS score between the 2 groups (5.86 +/- 1.84 vs 5.66 +/- 1.59, P=.729). Mean ICP for the first 3 days in the ICU was 17.23 +/- 9.0 mm Hg in the propofol group and 33.19 +/- 32.56 in the nonpropofol group, respectively (P=.017). Mean CPP for the first 5 days in the ICU was 71.10 +/- 15.32 mm Hg in the propofol group and 43.20 +/- 29.92 mm Hg in the nonpropofol group (P<.001). A higher survival rate was found in the propofol group (81.8% vs 46.7%, P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that propofol improved the outcome in recovery phase of head-injured patients
METHODS: Head-injured patients admitted to 3 hospitals during the period from January 2003 to December 2004 were included in this clinical trial. Data on patients' demographics, laboratory data, GCS score, ICP, CPP, concurrent medications, and therapeutic outcomes were collected.
RESULTS: Among the 104 patients included, only 44 were given propofol. The average age was 40.8 +/- 22 years for all patients, with 41.91 +/- 20.41 and 43.48 +/- 23.19 years for the propofol group and nonpropofol group, respectively (P=.097). There was no significant difference in baseline GCS score between the 2 groups (5.86 +/- 1.84 vs 5.66 +/- 1.59, P=.729). Mean ICP for the first 3 days in the ICU was 17.23 +/- 9.0 mm Hg in the propofol group and 33.19 +/- 32.56 in the nonpropofol group, respectively (P=.017). Mean CPP for the first 5 days in the ICU was 71.10 +/- 15.32 mm Hg in the propofol group and 43.20 +/- 29.92 mm Hg in the nonpropofol group (P<.001). A higher survival rate was found in the propofol group (81.8% vs 46.7%, P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that propofol improved the outcome in recovery phase of head-injured patients
File(s)

Loading...
Name
attachment.pdf
Size
161.98 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):85935dc8a849ea87a3306af442e2c4e1
Loading...
Name
attachment2.pdf
Size
34.07 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):d8b1c96ed47863dae443b5a5587c8b99