Options
Development and Implementation of Performance Evaluation System for Water Treatment Plant: Case study of Taipei Water Treatment Plant
Type
article
Resource
ASCE.(11):36-47.
Date Issued
2007
Author(s)
張怡怡
Chang EE; Chiang PC; Huang SM; Lin YL
Subjects
學科:生物化學暨細胞分子生物學科
期刊論文
Abstract
To implement performance assessment, it is necessary to develop adequate and representative performance indicators. Good
performance indicators can specify the measurable evidence that is necessary to document the achievement of a goal. To provide the
higher quality and stable water to the customers, the water utilities themselves should establish the proper maintenance and management
programs to enhance the availability of plant facilities and equipments in the water treatment plant. With the appropriate performance
indicators, the objectives and/or targets of the business plan can be evaluated quantitatively. The aim of this research work is to set up the
performance evaluation system for the Taipei water treatment plant. After the establishment of performance indicators seven in this
research, the corresponding evaluation items and their relative weights were revealed throughout forum discussion and questionnaire
survey and based on the comprehensive performance evaluation technique and analytic hierarchy process method, respectively. Meanwhile,
according to the results of performance evaluation and simulation studies by the developed model, an implementation plan for
upgrading the performance of the Taipei water treatment plant was proposed, with two important items: 1 proper adjustment of the water
production rate, PAC dosage, and sludge management for different turbidities in source water based on the required finished water quality
can minimize the total treatment cost and enhance the performance of the water treatment plant; and 2 establishing a regular performance
evaluation system to identify potential and existing problems so that correction action could be immediately taken. Developing a sound
database program, and cooperating with the stakeholders for source water protection are the major tasks that should be implemented to
achieve the objectives of safe drinking water and clean water.
performance indicators can specify the measurable evidence that is necessary to document the achievement of a goal. To provide the
higher quality and stable water to the customers, the water utilities themselves should establish the proper maintenance and management
programs to enhance the availability of plant facilities and equipments in the water treatment plant. With the appropriate performance
indicators, the objectives and/or targets of the business plan can be evaluated quantitatively. The aim of this research work is to set up the
performance evaluation system for the Taipei water treatment plant. After the establishment of performance indicators seven in this
research, the corresponding evaluation items and their relative weights were revealed throughout forum discussion and questionnaire
survey and based on the comprehensive performance evaluation technique and analytic hierarchy process method, respectively. Meanwhile,
according to the results of performance evaluation and simulation studies by the developed model, an implementation plan for
upgrading the performance of the Taipei water treatment plant was proposed, with two important items: 1 proper adjustment of the water
production rate, PAC dosage, and sludge management for different turbidities in source water based on the required finished water quality
can minimize the total treatment cost and enhance the performance of the water treatment plant; and 2 establishing a regular performance
evaluation system to identify potential and existing problems so that correction action could be immediately taken. Developing a sound
database program, and cooperating with the stakeholders for source water protection are the major tasks that should be implemented to
achieve the objectives of safe drinking water and clean water.
File(s)

Loading...
Name
attachment.pdf
Size
355.29 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):a0c81e9c83bf9f9f1d21a75fa933aef9
Loading...
Name
attachment2.pdf
Size
37.38 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):1fa60b07d162eaba8ab7ddd411ca900a