Options
D-dimer in patients with suspected acute mesenteric ischemia.
Type
article
Resource
Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;27(8):975-9.
Date Issued
2009
Author(s)
Chiu YH
Huang MK
How CK
Hsu TF
Chen JD
Chern CH
Yen DH
Huang CI.
Subjects
萬芳醫院
科部：急診科
類別：期刊論文
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess the diagnostic value of D-dimer in patients with suspected acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) and to evaluate the correlation between D-dimer levels and the severity of bowel necrosis.
METHODS: A prospective, noninterventional study of 67 patients with clinical suspicion of AMI was performed. Measurement of D-dimer levels was performed using a latex turbidimetric method.
RESULTS: Acute mesenteric ischemia was diagnosed in 23 patients (34.3%) and non-AMI in 44 patients (65.7%). Median D-dimer levels on admission were 6.24 microg fibrinogen equivalent units (FEU)/mL (range, 0.96-53.48 microg FEU/mL) in patients with AMI and 3.45 microg FEU/mL (range, 0.50-44.69 microg FEU/mL) in non-AMI patients (P = .064). D-dimer had poor discriminative value to differentiate the presence from the absence of AMI with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.78). A serum D-dimer cutoff value of 1.0 microg FEU/mL had a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 18%, a positive likelihood ratio of 1.17, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.24. Among patients with AMI verified at operation, 8 had resectable bowl necrosis and 9 had unresectable bowel necrosis. There was no difference in serum D-dimer levels between resectable and unresectable bowel necrosis (P = .665).
CONCLUSIONS: Detection of serum D-dimer could not help to differentiate patient with AMI from those with non-AMI. We did not find a correlation between serum D-dimer levels and the severity of AMI. However, measurement of D-dimer levels can be of value for a small decrease in the likelihood of AMI, when the result is low.
METHODS: A prospective, noninterventional study of 67 patients with clinical suspicion of AMI was performed. Measurement of D-dimer levels was performed using a latex turbidimetric method.
RESULTS: Acute mesenteric ischemia was diagnosed in 23 patients (34.3%) and non-AMI in 44 patients (65.7%). Median D-dimer levels on admission were 6.24 microg fibrinogen equivalent units (FEU)/mL (range, 0.96-53.48 microg FEU/mL) in patients with AMI and 3.45 microg FEU/mL (range, 0.50-44.69 microg FEU/mL) in non-AMI patients (P = .064). D-dimer had poor discriminative value to differentiate the presence from the absence of AMI with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.78). A serum D-dimer cutoff value of 1.0 microg FEU/mL had a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 18%, a positive likelihood ratio of 1.17, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.24. Among patients with AMI verified at operation, 8 had resectable bowl necrosis and 9 had unresectable bowel necrosis. There was no difference in serum D-dimer levels between resectable and unresectable bowel necrosis (P = .665).
CONCLUSIONS: Detection of serum D-dimer could not help to differentiate patient with AMI from those with non-AMI. We did not find a correlation between serum D-dimer levels and the severity of AMI. However, measurement of D-dimer levels can be of value for a small decrease in the likelihood of AMI, when the result is low.
File(s)
No Thumbnail Available
Name
attachment.pdf
Size
193.78 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):aba4c88c29acb0e24a9615f09fe6a8df